View Mobile Site

Manteca conservation slips

Water use down only 10.4% during July

Text Size: Small Large Medium
Manteca conservation slips

A third year of drought is sending the San Joaquin River lower and exposing sand bars. This photo of the river was taken Thursday south of Manteca.

HIME ROMERO/The Bulletin


POSTED August 8, 2014 1:33 a.m.

Manteca’s water conservation efforts slid backwards in July.

Overall, the city’s 72,000 residents and more than 1,000 business concerns used 557.395 million gallons of water in July. That’s down 10.4 percent from July 2013 when Manteca used 610.777 million gallons.

The July water use report from the City of Manteca Public Works Department contrasts with June when the city reduced water use by 20.4 percent. Manteca went from 631 million in June 2013 to 502 million gallons in June 2014. Water use dropped in May by 8 percent going from 534 million gallons in May 2013 down to 490 million gallons in May 2014.

Gov. Jerry Brown called for urban users to reduce water consumption by 20 percent when he declared a state of emergency when California started its third consecutive drought year in January.

There were roughly the same temperatures in Manteca this July compared to the same month in 2013. Last month there were eight days over 100 degrees with the highest being 105 degrees. There were 15 days of 90 to 100 degree weather and eight days when it was below 90 degrees. July of 2013 saw five days of 100 degree plus heat with the hottest day coming in at 107 degrees. There were 20 days with a high of 90 to 100 degrees and six days under 90 degrees.

Water experts have warned if rainfall and snow pack is normal or above normal this coming wet season that the drought will still persist and get slightly worse. But if there is a fourth dry year, many regions in the state will start experiencing acute water shortages.

South San Joaquin Irrigation District General Manager Jeff Shields has noted unless there is an above normal year coming up for precipitation, significant cutbacks would take place to water deliveries to both urban and water users. The SSJID provides treated water for Manteca, Lathrop and Tracy as well as farm water for more than 72,000 acres.

He has repeatedly cautioned farmers and urban dwellers alike not to waste water and to cut back this year in the event the drought continues next year.

“Once you use the water you can’t get it back,” he told the Manteca City Council earlier this year in a presentation about the severity of the drought.

Manteca’s water conservation effort has been much more effective though than many of its neighboring cities. Ripon, as an example, reduced water use by 7 percent in June compared to 20.4 percent for Manteca.

Manteca’s June reduction occurred even with 1,000 plus more residents than in June 2013 and having to use 4 million gallons for state mandated testing of the new water tank on Atherton Drive. That water was dumped directly into the storm drain system during the testing.

Enter a Comment:

You must be logged in to post comments.
http://mantecabulletin.com/ encourages readers to interact with one another. We will not edit your comments, but we reserve the right to delete any inappropriate responses.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, contact our editor.

The comments below are from readers of http://mantecabulletin.com/ and do not necessarily represent the views of The Newspaper or Morris Multimedia.

1 comment
fjar: 1 month, 3 weeks ago

Comment:
Manteca council slipped because they have no conservation plan in effect. The only ones selected by this council to conserve,is the residents. All businesses are exempt from the conservation of water. Newly developed homes are exempt as well.We are compelled to brown out our lawns and we are penalized by the city if we go over the average in water usage.
This is while businesses and Development get an open tap to water usage.No graduated penalty program is assigned to Special Interest. This council and city wants residents to save the 20.4% state Mandated conservation request. The council thanks everyone for the conservation effort, so the new development they approved of can use the savings in water.
This council has a history of shafting the Manteca residents.

They have a history of forcing parks on residents and then they approve of LMDs to pay for the up-keep. Why shouldn't residents have a say, in whether they want a park or not.At the council meeting a gentlemen proved they were over charging residents by fluctuating the annual payments. Residents are overcharged for parks and this council splits the over-charge with developers. Bad deal for residents.

I approached this council with ideas to save water, but none of the five members even cared about what I said. For some reason, they don't want to burden Developers with code changes that would conserve a lot of water. This council at this point, could care less about conservation, for 2 of the members are retiring.
The worse mistake the people could make in voting this year, is reinstalling incumbent's on the council. My question is, do you want change, or be the kicking post of returning council people. You see how they have made us the only ones who have to conserve water.
This council could care less about the present status of our water, or the conservation effort that will restore it.
All this council has done is to suck up to Developers and Special Interest for kick-backs,
to build on their campaign fund.
It's a sorry bunch of representatives, that would vote on more housing, while we are in a severe pro-longed drought in California. Signs are posted on highways to conserve and rivers are at an all time low. Two vital lakes are receding in depth, that would be Lake Tahoe and lake Mead.Tahoe is the source of water for Reno and if it gets lower their drinking water will cease to flow. Lake Mead furnishes power for Las Vegas and drinking water. This council is aware of these drought conditions and they trade taxes for water, in Manteca. If the people are so bent on putting these people back in office, then think about the priority they chose over the preservation of life sustaining water in this city.
Fleener Richards.




Please wait ...