By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
SF restaurants probed over pocketing health care surcharge on customers
Placeholder Image

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Dozens of San Francisco restaurants are under investigation for exploiting a new city program by keeping customer surcharges instead of spending them on employee health care, city attorney Dennis Herrera announced Friday.

Herrera said during a City Hall press conference that the offending restaurants have until April 10 to spend at least half the fees collected on employee health care or face consumer fraud lawsuits. Unspent fees must then be turned over to the city, which will use the money for future enforcement of the city's landmark universal health care program.

The so-called Health San Francisco program launched in 2008 and requires city businesses to set aside $1 to $3 an hour per worker for health care costs. Many San Francisco restaurants have taken to paying for the program by charging diners an extra fee for every meal.

The city's Office of Labor Standards Enforcement reported that only about one-third of the $14 million city restaurants collected in surcharges were spent on workers' health care.

"We San Franciscans take great pride in a vibrant local restaurant scene," Herrera said. "And it's unfortunate that the illegal business practices of a relative handful of bad actors require the creation of this enforcement initiative."

The city has about 3,500 restaurants, the most in the United States on a per capita basis.

Herrera didn't name any of the restaurants under investigation. He said that "several dozen" restaurants consider to be the worst offenders were sent "target" letters on Friday informing of the offer to avoid litigation.

Those restaurants are also required to prove a full accounting to the city attorney of all fees collected and spent.

The Golden Gate Restaurant Association said an overwhelming majority of eateries are complying with the health care program and that it supported Herrera's approach of "partial amnesty" because some of the suspected "worst offenders" may be in arrears because of innocent mistakes.

The association's director Rob Black said "the vast majority of businesses are not misrepresenting information to their customers."