By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
RACE FOR STATE CONTROLLER
Recount procedures highlights California election-law flaws
Placeholder Image
SACRAMENTO (AP) — In the disputed race for state controller, all sides can agree on one thing: A vote recount starting Friday is unprecedented in its scope, leaving California officials in uncharted territory.The process also has illuminated serious shortcomings in California’s election law, which has no provision for an automatic recount, even when the final margin is tight.Former Assembly Speaker John Perez, D-Los Angeles, requested the recount after finishing third in the June 3 primary, just 481 votes behind Democratic Board of Equalization member Betty Yee out of 4.46 million cast in the controller’s race. Fresno Mayor Ashley Swearengin, a Republican, easily came in first, but only the top two vote-getters advance to November’s general election.It is the first recount in a statewide candidate election in modern California history.The narrow margin in the controller’s race— less than 0.1 percent — prompted Perez’s campaign to request a targeted recount in 15 counties, beginning Friday in Kern and Imperial. Under California law, a candidate or any registered California voter can request a recount in any precinct in any county, but they must pay for it.The price is steep.