LOCAL REACTION
Nicholas Hatten, executive director of the San Joaquin Pride Center: “I couldn’t be happier. I’ll take this for the state of California and we’ll embrace equality for our state.”
“We’ve been dealing with this since 2008, so it’s been a five-year battle. It was hard, because some people were allowed to stay married and others weren’t. It created a two-class citizenship in the LGBT (Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Transgender) community. Today, they acknowledge love is love and you have the right to join in union with whoever you choose.”
Connie Liberato, member of St. Anthony of Padua Catholic Church, Manteca: “I’m against it; it’s not right. That’s not the way we were put on this earth. We’re not going to have any kids being born. Where are they gonna come from – a sperm bank? Where’s the population gonna go? I’ll follow whatever they (courts) decide to do but we’re all against it. My kids are all against it. The ones I talk to are against it. That’s not the way God made it. God made man and woman, to reproduce and bring children to the world. I don’t think (same-sex couples) should be able to adopt a child. It’s embarrassing. It’s just not right.”
Reaction from US Conference of Catholic Bishops. “Today is a tragic day for marriage and our nation. The Supreme Court has dealt a profound injustice to the American people by striking down in part the federal Defense of Marriage Act. The Court got it wrong. The federal government ought to respect the truth that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, even where states fail to do so. The preservation of liberty and justice requires that all laws, federal and state, respect the truth, including the truth about marriage. It is also unfortunate that the Court did not take the opportunity to uphold California’s Proposition 8 but instead decided not to rule on the matter. The common good of all, especially our children, depends upon a society that strives to uphold the truth of marriage. Now is the time to redouble our efforts in witness to this truth. These decisions are part of a public debate of great consequence. The future of marriage and the well-being of our society hang in the balance.
“Marriage is the only institution that brings together a man and a woman for life, providing any child who comes from their union with the secure foundation of a mother and a father.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way Wednesday for gay marriages to resume in California following a bitter, five-year legal battle, but the nation’s most populous state might have to wait at least 25 days before joining the 12 other states where gay couples already have the right to wed.
Sidestepping the larger question of whether banning gay marriage is unconstitutional, the high court justices held 5-4 that the coalition of religious conservative groups that qualified California’s voter-approved ban for the ballot did not have the authority to defend it after state officials refused to do so.
As a result, the justices let stand a San Francisco trial court’s ruling in August 2010 that overturned the ban. Other states were left to keep hashing out whether gay marriage should be legal within their borders.
“We couldn’t be happier. We’re so relieved that we’re no longer being discriminated against. We’re so happy that we can get married,” said Lisa Dazols, who had a wedding celebration earlier this month but postponed her honeymoon while she and her partner waited to see if the state would sanction their marriage.
“We’re really just a couple who are in love, who want equality like everyone else, so it’s a very exciting day for us,” she said.
It remained unclear, however, when gay marriages might start again in the state. Backers of the ban known as Proposition 8 have 25 days to ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision. A midlevel appeals court also must lift a hold it placed on the lower court order before the state can be free to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
Still, state officials moved quickly to signal their approval. Gov. Jerry Brown, who refused to defend Proposition 8 as governor and in his previous job as attorney general, said he had directed the California Department of Public Health to start issuing licenses to gay couples as soon as the hold ordered by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is lifted.
State Attorney General Kamala Harris went even further, publicly urging the appellate court to act ahead of the final word from the Supreme Court.
“I’m absolutely saying that if the 9th Circuit lifts its stay before the 25 days, that marriages can resume in California, and shall resume in California,” Harris said.
Without offering any specifics about their next move, lawyers for Proposition 8 sponsors insisted the attorney general and governor remained obligated by the California Constitution to enforce Proposition 8 and that Wednesday’s ruling only legalized marriage for the two couples who sued to overturn the ban.
“Everyone understands that our opponents did not file this lawsuit to prove or demonstrate we did not have standing,” said Austin Nimiocks, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom. “What was sought in this lawsuit was a 50-state mandate or to establish there is a fundamental right to same-sex marriage, which the Supreme Court did not rule today,”
David Boies, a lawyer for the couples behind the lawsuit, said any attempt by opponents to delay gay marriage would be futile because of the ruling involving California and another Supreme Court ruling on Wednesday that invalidated the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal law that prevents the U.S. government from granting marriage benefits to gay couples.
“The court agreed with us, and agreed with the district court, that the proponents did not have any interest, did not suffer any harm from marriage equality,” Boles said. “So that decision, particularly in combination with the DOMA decision, means it’s quite clear we are going to have marriage equality in all 50 states.”
The battle over same-sex marriage in California has been in overdrive since 2004, when the then-mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom, ordered city clerks to issue marriage licenses to gay couples.
Lawsuits that resulted from his decision prompted the California Supreme Court to overturn the state’s man-woman marriage laws in 2008, making California the second state after Massachusetts to legalize gay marriage.
In anticipation, opponents of same-sex marriage qualified a proposed constitutional amendment for the ballot banning same-sex marriage. Proposition 8 passed with 52 percent of the vote in November 2008.
The Williams Institute, a think tank at UCLA, estimates that 18,000 couples got married in California in the four-and-a-half months that gay marriage was legal.
As hundreds of people gathered at San Francisco City Hall to applaud the Supreme Court ruling, City Attorney Dennis Herrera recalled how many fellow Democrats had criticized the action by him and Newsom as “too fast, too soon, too much.”
“Well heck, now we have 12 states and the District of Columbia that have marriage equality, and now California will have it restored once again,” he said.
