By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Manteca helps pay to replace grass with water-efficient landscaping options
no grass.jpg
DENNIS WYATT/The Bulletin Of the tour homes along this stretch of Mono Street in a new neighborhood in southeast Manteca, three went without grass including the one in the foreground that incorporated a front yard patio.

Some 197,479 square feet of grass — almost five acres — have been converted to more water efficient and lower maintenance landscaping through the City of Manteca’s turf replacement incentive program.

It started in the middle of the last drought with 150,772 square feet of grass replaced in the first two years it was offered — 2015 and 2016 — as stricter water conversation measures went into effect. There have been 272 homeowners and commercial properties that have participated in the program.

 With Manteca and the rest of the San Joaquin County as well as the Sacramento Valley now in exceptional drought — the worst category possible — as well as 85 percent of California in extreme drought, city officials are hoping more people will take advantage of the program.

The city’s lawn-to-garden rebate program is designed to remove high water consuming turf and replacing it with water-efficient landscaping suited to the semi-arid climate of the Northern San Joaquin Valley. It pays an incentive of $1 per square foot up to 650 feet for residential and 5,000 square feet for commercial to help offset conversion costs.

Irrigating lawns is by far the No. 1 single use of water in Manteca. It is also believed to be the most inefficient and biggest waste of water as well due to run-off into gutters as well as people watering when they are not supposed to between noon and 6 p.m. when evaporation is at its highest and grass is less likely to absorb water due to the heat.

Part of the waste is also attributed to people watering grass during the cold of winter when lawn types such as Bermuda grass go dormant and turn yellow on the assumption the grass needs water to stay alive. Another factor in waste are automatic sprinkler systems that residents don’t override when there has been adequate rain that day or several days prior to meet the water needs of grass.

Information and applications on the turf replacement program can be found on the city’s website ( by going to Public Works, clicking on Water Division, and scrolling down to Water Conservation.

A city requirement that sets a mandatory cap on the turf areas allowed in the front yard of new homes built — a mandate that is not connected with the turf replacement program for existing homes and businesses — was launched in mid-2015 has seen a surge in the number of homebuyers opting for no grass in front yards at all.

A windshield survey of 30 newer homes built in the past year in southeast Manteca showed that almost 3 out of every 5 buyers are eschewing all grass in front yards.

The city mandate dictates no more than 25 percent of the required landscape area for front yards can be in grass. The same goes for side yards on corner lots.

The 25 percent cap for grass in front yard landscaping doesn’t mean that it has to be planted in any turf. The ordnance simply states that the 35 percent area of the front yard that is required to be landscaped must use living plant material.

Manteca’s rules stop short of Las Vegas. That city bans any lawn front being planted the front yard of new homes. Las Vegas also restricts grass in side and rear yards to either 50 percent of the area or a 100 square feet — whichever is greater — with the max being 5,000 square feet. Grass is not allowed in nonresidential areas unless by special permit. The lone exceptions to that restriction are parks, schools, and cemeteries.


To contact Dennis Wyatt, email